May 26, 2010
Corona Chamber Leads
Local Effort To Oppose Proposition 16
The outcome of every measure on
the June 8, 2010 statewide ballot will have an impact on the
Corona business community. It is the role of the Corona
Chamber to take positions on these issues and to educate our
business community on the impact of the issues before them.
One of the ballot measures, Proposition 16, should gain the
majority support of voters, would require a two-thirds voter
approval before local governments can provide electricity
service to customers or implement a community choice
electricity program using public funds or bonds.
“The Corona Chamber opposes Proposition 16 because it makes
it more difficult than it is currently for local entities to
form either municipal utilities, or community wide
electricity districts,” stated Bobby Spiegel, President
CEO/President of the Corona Chamber. “Our Chamber’s
Legislative Action Committee’s outreach efforts, will
continue its efforts to notify members and others about the
wrong message that those supporting Proposition 16 are
presenting,” Spiegel continued.
Proposition 16 places new voter approval requirements on
local governments before they can use “public funds” –
defined broadly in the measure to include tax revenues,
various forms of debt, and ratepayer funds – to start up
electricity service, expand electricity service into a new
territory, or implement a Community Choice Aggregation (CCA).
First, before an authorized local government entity can
start up electricity service, it must receive approval by
two-thirds of the voters in the area proposed to be served.
Second, before an existing publicly owned utility can expand
its electric delivery service into a new territory, it must
receive approval by two-thirds of the voters in the area
currently served by the utility and two-thirds of the voters
in the new area proposed to be served.
Third, the measure requires two-thirds voter approval for a
local government to implement a CCA.
Californians generally receive their electricity service
from one of three types of providers: investor-owned
utilities (IOUs), local publicly owned electric utilities,
or electric service providers (ESPs). These provide 68
percent, 24 percent, and 8 percent, respectively, of retail
electricity service in the state.
According to Mark Toney, Executive Director of The Utility
Reform Network (TURN), a nonprofit consumer advocacy group,
Proposition 16 takes self-interest in a ballot initiative to
a new level, by rewriting the constitution to protect a
private corporation from competition from public entities.
Elisabeth Brinton, Director of Communications for the
Sacramento Municipal Utility District, a public utility, has
said that Proposition 16 reduces the ability of people to
choose between private and public utility companies. Holding
local elections where people vote on whether to have a
private or public utility company would be expensive.
The Chamber urges a NO vote on Proposition 16 on June 8,
2010.
May 26, 2010
Corona Chamber Urges
Action On June 8th Statewide Ballot Measures
The Corona Chamber of Commerce
urges the business community to understand the impact of the
June 8, 2010 statewide ballot measures. Specifically, the
five measures on the June ballot will have direct impacts on
Corona’s recovering economy and the Chamber is working hard
to educate local businesses on why each of them are
important.
“It is the responsibility of the Corona Chamber to represent
the interests of Corona businesses at all levels of
government,” stated Cynthia Schneider, Chair of the Chambers
Legislative Action Committee. “However, we are the most
effective when our businesses understand the issues facing
all of us and they help play an active role in each issue,”
Schneider continued.
The
Corona Chamber SUPPORTS the following:
Proposition 13: Seismic
Retrofitting
Proposition 14: Elections: Open Primaries
Proposition 17: Continuous
Coverage Auto Insurance Discount Act
The Corona
Chamber OPPOSES the following:
Proposition 15: California
Fair Election Act
Proposition 16: Taxpayers Right To Vote Act
Below are some explanations
of the Corona Chamber's positions: